Towards Contemporary Neuroethics: Why Does It Make Sense to Re-define Placebo?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Comment on "Does it make sense to speak of neuroethics?".
©2008 EurOpEaN MOLEcuLar BiOLOgy OrgaNizatiON correspondence correspondence Comment on " Does it make sense to speak of neuroethics? " L ast year's Special issue of EMBO reports was a welcome contribution to the debates about the emerging chal lenges of basic and clinical neuroscience, and the related field of 'neuroethics'. parens & Johnston's (2007) discussion of the prob lems that they ass...
متن کاملSense tagging: does it make sense?
Sense tagging is probably one of the challenges that corpus linguists have to face in the near future. So far, computerisation of this task has yielded very modest results despite numerous efforts, and sense tagging is turning out to be a touchy task. Difficulties stem from various sources, extracting disambiguating information from the context. However, one of the main problems that lies upstr...
متن کاملDoes it make sense to speak of neuroethics? Three problems with keying ethics to hot new science and technology.
The field of bioethics has been split into subspecialties over the past few decades. In some cases, it was divided in terms of social domains, such as clinical ethics, research ethics and public-health ethics. In other cases, it was separated in terms of methodological approaches, including principle-based bioethics, virtue ethics and narrative ethics. Yet more divisions were made in terms of m...
متن کاملOne-Phase Commit: Does it make Sense?
1 Although widely used in distributed transactional systems, the so-called Two-Phase Commit (2PC) protocol introduces a substantial delay in transaction processing, even in the absence of failures. This has led several researchers to look for alternative commit protocols that minimize the time cost associated with coordination messages and forced log writes in 2PC. In particular, variations of ...
متن کاملBoolean Coherence: Does it make sense?
We continually face the problem of making sense of the world by resolving conflicting reports from multiple sources of information. This is particularly so if we attempt to formulate Qualitative Safety1 Arguments. Traditional logic offers little to assist in this process. In every day reasoning we usually assume that, without information to the contrary, we should use all information from all s...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
سال: 2014
ISSN: 1334-4676,1334-4684
DOI: 10.7906/indecs.12.4.7